Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
sans particularité
English translation:
unremarkable/normal/NAD(no abnormalities detected)
French term
Translation is depth of the passion
Native in: English 
Works in: French to English, English to French, Portuguese to English
sans particularité
Un réchauffement par couverture à air puisé (Bair Hugger®, Gamida™, Eaubonne, France) permettait une correction de l'hypothermie en 22 heures (Fig. 1).
| 4 +4 | nothing remarkable |
NancyLynn
|
| 4 | inconspicuous (within normal limits or normal) |
Ellen Kraus
|
Jan 14, 2012 03:05: cc in nyc changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Jan 14, 2012 18:44: pooja_chic Created KOG entry
Non-PRO (3): SJLD, Rachel Fell, cc in nyc
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Austria
more than thirty years of experience
Native in: German
Works in: Greek to German, English to German, Greek to English, and 5 more.
inconspicuous (within normal limits or normal)
nothing remarkable
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 mins (2012-01-13 20:01:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
#
Test Results
www.health-forums.com/alt-support-cancer.../test-results-17...
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
14 posts - 9 authors - 2 Nov 2011
Default Re: Test Results ... I also get a regular lab test for a "colon cancer marker" .... He found nothing remarkable at the radiation site. > ...
Get more discussion results
#
The results are in - Alopecia World
www.alopeciaworld.com/profiles/blogs/2022678:BlogPost:52599
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
29 May 2008 – The doctor's office called yesterday with the results from last week's blood test. Nothing remarkable. I'm relieved, yet disappointed, as I was ...
#
Ultrasonography of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › ... › v.16(29); Aug 7, 2010
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
by JY Cao - 2010 - Cited by 1 - Related articles
7 Aug 2010 – Physical examination found nothing remarkable. No cervical or inguinal lymphadenopathy was found. The laboratory test results were as ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs (2012-01-14 01:57:14 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
yes, I double-checked my test results and you know what, it was "unremarkable", and not "nothing remarkable as I indicated above. That'll teach me to trust my memory!
| neutral |
SJLD
: except we would say normal usually - or NAD in medical shorthand
4 mins
|
| agree |
Michael Barnett
: I would agree with unremarkable as per SJLD's reference.
22 mins
|
|
yes, I spontaneously came up with this term because it was used on two of my own test results recently :)
|
|
| agree |
Rachel Fell
: as per above agreers
50 mins
|
| agree |
Laurent Chevrette (X)
: normal or unremarkable
5 hrs
|
| agree |
cc in nyc
: unremarkable
7 hrs
|
Discussion