English term
nor
(Nor is usually used when we speak about two things or persons. Here, the write just describes one person. please explain it how it is grammatically possible to use nor in this phrase. Thank you)
4 +7 | and it cannot | philgoddard |
4 +5 | neither | eski |
5 +3 | double negative | Tony M |
Mar 17, 2016 17:58: Steffen Walter changed "Field (specific)" from "Business/Commerce (general)" to "Poetry & Literature"
Mar 18, 2016 09:51: Yvonne Gallagher changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Non-PRO (3): Tony M, Victoria Britten, Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
and it cannot
It's just old-fashioned English.
agree |
Tony M
2 mins
|
neutral |
Sheila Wilson
: Gainsaid is certainly old-fashioned, but I doubt it was ever right to use "nor" in this context // I'm sure typos have always been around :). And it cannot be denied/gainsaid is fine, IMO. But nor needs another negative to be present.
9 mins
|
I think Sir Arthur Conan Doyle knew what he was doing! It's a rather elegant shorthand which, as Tony points out, avoids a double negative.
|
|
agree |
Charles Davis
: Sheila is wrong. "Nor" meaning "and not" after a positive term or statement was possible in seventeenth-century English, which Conan Doyle is imitating here.
1 hr
|
agree |
Rachel Fell
2 hrs
|
agree |
claude-andrew
2 hrs
|
agree |
David Hollywood
: spot on Phil
10 hrs
|
agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
17 hrs
|
agree |
Ildiko Santana
3 days 11 hrs
|
double negative
'gainsaid' is an old-fashioned word that today would be more likely rendered using words like 'denied' or 'contradicted' or 'doubted'.
agree |
claude-andrew
: I love "gainsay" and use it, much to the perplexity of my wife!
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Claude! Yes, I should imagine that might discountenance here somewhat ;-)
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
22 hrs
|
Thanks, Tina!
|
|
agree |
acetran
22 hrs
|
Thanks, A/T!
|
neither
"Neither can it be said..."
... that age in which she said, 'Silver and gold have I none.'”—“True, holy father,” replied Aquinas; “neither can she any longer say to the lame, 'Rise up and walk
:))
agree |
Tony M
: Yes, the use of both 'nor' and 'neither' in this way is archaic; cf. many older versions of the Bible.
13 mins
|
Thanks, Tony: fits in with the style of the text, methinks.. :))
|
|
agree |
claude-andrew
2 hrs
|
Thank you for your confirmation, claude-andrew. :))
|
|
agree |
David Hollywood
: another workable option
10 hrs
|
Hi David, thank you for your confirmation. :))
|
|
agree |
acetran
22 hrs
|
Thanks for your confirmation & hope you have a good weekend, acetran. :))
|
|
agree |
Ildiko Santana
3 days 11 hrs
|
Thank you for your confirmation, Ildiko! :))
|
Discussion
"When I am gone, dream me some happiness;
Nor let thy looks our long-hid love confess"