Spanish term
Argentina
Multilingual Experts
Native in: English (Variants: Canadian, UK, US) 
Works in: English, Spanish to English, English to Spanish, and 12 more.
doctrina securitista
A modo de ejemplo, en el art. 7 de la Declaración de Nueva York (ONU; 2016) y en el art. 11 de la Promoción de la Salud Universal de la OMS (2016) se modifica la visión humanitaria hacia migrantes basada en la solidaridad, desplazándose el marco de derechos humanos en migración. Paradójicamente, bajo la nueva doctrina securitista, se considera que la atención de la salud de migrantes es una cuestión de justicia, exigiendo obligaciones sociales de “cobertura universal de salud” -CUS- (OMS, 2016; DNU 986/2016 Argentina).
insurance based?
Thanks
| 3 +2 | securitist doctrine |
Sonia Ordóñez
|
| 3 +1 | health security doctrine/doctrine for health security |
David Hollywood
|
Non-PRO (1): Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
English to Spanish Translator
Native in: Spanish (Variant: Standard-Spain) 
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English
securitist doctrine
worked for int. orgs (IMF, OAS, IDB)
Native in: English
Works in: Spanish to English, German to English
health security doctrine/doctrine for health security
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 13:33:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
"health security" is fine and check this ref out:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/1...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 13:34:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Executive Order -- Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure from Infectious Disease Threats
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 13:34:20 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Executive Order -- Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda to Achieve a World Safe and Secure from Infectious Disease Threats
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 13:35:17 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
and this ref:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404244/
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 13:36:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
from the US NIH to boot:
Promoting Health Security: Potential, Role, and Future Directions of a Medical University
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-11-04 14:12:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
"securitist" is ok but maybe a hint too philosophical ... anyway ok
| agree |
Robert Carter
: While "securitism" seems to be a word used in this context (albeit by a lone author), I could find hardly any references to "securitist". And how anyone could vote non-PRO on this question is utterly beyond me.
15 hrs
|
|
thanks Robert
|
Something went wrong...